O problema dos honorários advocatícios

a verba sucumbencial como instrumento de racionalização contenciosa

Authors

  • Marcelo Navarro Ribeiro Dantas
  • Ramiro Freitas de Alencar Barroso

Keywords:

Attorney’s fees, Loss of a case, Code of Civil Procedure, Litigation

Abstract

This article examines the historical and legal evolution of attorney’s fees for losing a case in Brazil, from the punitive nature of the 1939 Code of Civil Procedure to the remuneration model consolidated by the 2015 Code of Civil Procedure. It analyzes how ownership of the funds shifted from the winning party to the lawyer and how the new code transformed losing a case into an instrument for streamlining litigation, imposing costs and responsibilities proportional to judicial defeat. It highlights the tension between normative predictability and judicial autonomy, as well as the impacts of this transition on procedural culture and judicial efficiency. It concludes that the current regime reflects a structural change that values the legal profession and seeks to curb excessive litigation through economic incentives and jurisprudential stability.

Author Biographies

Marcelo Navarro Ribeiro Dantas

Doutor e Mestre em Direito pela Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo. Professor Titular da Universidade de Brasília (UnB). Professor Emérito da Universidade Nove de Julho (UniNove). Ministro do Superior Tribunal de Justiça.

Ramiro Freitas de Alencar Barroso

Doutor em Direito pela Universidade de Brasília. Advogado de Caputo, Bastos e Serra Advogados.

Published

2025-12-12

How to Cite

Dantas, M. N. R. ., & Barroso, R. F. de A. . (2025). O problema dos honorários advocatícios: a verba sucumbencial como instrumento de racionalização contenciosa. Revista De Direito Da ADVOCEF, 21(40), 89–112. Retrieved from https://revista.advocef.org.br/index.php/ra/article/view/512

Issue

Section

Artigos Gerais