As variações de significado do termo ‘dano indenizável’

desambiguação essencial

Authors

  • Rafael Peteffi da Silva Faculdade de Direito da UFSC

Keywords:

Compensable damage, Civil liability, Unlawfulness, Normative concept

Abstract

This article analyzes the different meanings of the term “compensable damage” in civil liability, distinguishing between the broad and strict senses. In the broad sense, compensable damage relates to the other requirements of civil liability – fault, unlawfulness, and causal link functioning as an element that enables the emergence of the duty to compensate. In the strict sense, damage has its own normative content, independent of these other elements, and can be understood as harm to a legally protected interest. The study argues that both approaches are useful: the broad, to identify the limits of the duty to compensate; and the strict, to grant autonomy and conceptual effectiveness to damage as a requirement of civil liability. The author concludes that terminological precision is essential to avoid theoretical confusion and ensure coherence in the compensation system.

Author Biography

Rafael Peteffi da Silva, Faculdade de Direito da UFSC

Professor da Faculdade de Direito da UFSC. Mestre em Direito (UFRGS). Doutor em Direito Civil (USP). Estágio pós-doutoral na Universidade de Girona/ES e na Universidade de Oxford. Coordenador do Grupo de Pesquisas do CNPQ “Direito Civil na Contemporaneidade”. Editor da Revista de Direito Civil Contemporâneo (RT/ Thomson Reuters). Coordenador Regional (Santa Catarina) do Comitê Brasileiro de Arbitragem (Cbar).

Published

2025-12-12

How to Cite

Silva, R. P. da . (2025). As variações de significado do termo ‘dano indenizável’: desambiguação essencial. Revista De Direito Da ADVOCEF, 21(40), 221–236. Retrieved from https://revista.advocef.org.br/index.php/ra/article/view/517

Issue

Section

Artigos Gerais